Average customer rating:
|
Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management (with InfoTrac®)
Archie B. Carroll , and Ann K. Buchholtz Manufacturer: South-Western College Pub ProductGroup: Book Binding: Hardcover Similar Items:
ASIN: 0324225814 |
Book Description
Make smarter business decisions with BUSINESS AND SOCIETY: ETHICS AND STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT! Emphasizing a business's social, legal, and ethical responsibilities, this management text exposes you to diverse and important stakeholder and ethical frameworks for considering and protecting stakeholder interests. Through its use of cases and other real-world applications, you'll get the opportunity to apply stakeholder and ethical systems to specific business problems. With questions provided for all cases and applications, preparing for class has never been easier!Customer Reviews:
Business & Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management w/ infotrack review.......2007-01-10
Average customer rating:
|
Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy
Anne T. Lawrence , James Weber , and James E. Post Manufacturer: McGraw-Hill Companies ProductGroup: Book Binding: Hardcover Similar Items:
ASIN: 0072986212 |
Customer Reviews:
The Leader in Corporate Social Performance.......2007-07-17
good.......2007-07-08
All common sense.......2007-02-11
robbery.......2007-01-18
Average customer rating: |
Inside the Mind of the Stakeholder: The Hype Behind Stakeholder Pressure
Manufacturer: Palgrave Macmillan ProductGroup: Book Binding: Hardcover ASIN: 0230006892 Release Date: 2006-11-14 |
Book Description
Average customer rating:
|
The Stakeholder Society
Anne Alstott , and Bruce A. Ackerman Manufacturer: Yale University Press ProductGroup: Book Binding: Paperback Similar Items:
ASIN: 0300082606 |
Amazon.com
The main obstacle that many young people face in building their future is a lack of initial resources. Now here's a radical idea--what if every United States citizen with a high school diploma was guaranteed, on their 21st birthday, $80,000, no strings attached? Bruce Ackerman and Anne Alstott believe it's a doable scheme to ensure that every American will get "a fair share of the nation's resources as they accept the full responsibilities of adult life." The Stakeholder Society lays out the basic principles of their plan and rebuts potential objections. No, it's not a gift--you have to pay it back, if you can, towards the end of your life. Yes, some people will use their stake unwisely--but the authors argue that freedom is better served by having the opportunity to make mistakes than by never getting a chance to move forward. They are also careful to point out that, ultimately, the stakeholder system is not so much a full frontal assault on poverty as it is a citizen-building program, helping people feel like a valued part of U.S. society and making it easier for them to contribute to that society's success. "If America drifts away from the promise of equal opportunity," the authors warn, "it is not because practical steps are unavailable, but because we have lost our way." Whether The Stakeholder Society contains those "practical steps" is a matter that should be considered very attentively by policymakers and all citizens concerned with the fate of the United States in the 21st century. --Ron HoganBook Description
Must we resign ourselves to a growing chasm between rich and poor? Bruce Ackerman and Anne Alstott propose an innovative alternative in this thought-provoking book: an eighty thousand dollar grant for every qualifying young adult. The authors analyze this plan from many perspectives and argue that such a citizen's stake would open the way to a society that is more democratic, productive, and free.Customer Reviews:
Also read "In Our Hands".......2006-06-25
great, smart work that could change America.........2005-04-20
Brilliant and Flawed.......2003-03-09
Ackerman and Alstott dismiss a number of other approaches, such as funding education better or raising minimum wages as too small and/or actually harmful and/or politically difficult. Unhappily, I'm inclined to think that their proposals are just as politically difficult.
And I have a quibble with the digs scattered through this book against "utilitarians," who are never named. As in all American ethical arguments, the example used is that of Nazi Germany, where Jews were one percent of the population. "[I]s it so clear," the authors ask, "that the average Jew suffered NINETY-NINE times as much as the average Aryan gained from his feelings of racial superiority?"
One response to this is that feelings like those often involve hatred, which, being unpleasant, is not a gain at all. But, even accepting that there was a gain for many racists, the trade-off is not necessary. The racists could have felt superior without killing anyone, an action which, if completed, would have deprived them of the allegedly beneficial presence of people they perceived as inferiors.
More importantly, these numbers (one and ninety-nine units of pleasure or suffering) do not mean anything. We could give a vivid description of the concentration camps and then ask "Isn't it abundantly clear that the average Jew suffered at least ninety-nine times as much as the average Aryan gained from his feelings of racial superiority?" The case for this "calculation" is exactly as good as for its opposite.
The value of utilitarianism lies not in calculations (calculations which Ackerman and Alstott accept while trying to dismiss) but in placing the well-being of people above adherence to any rule. Utilitarianism ought to be an ally of anyone who recognizes the harm done by devotion to certain rights and freedoms, such as the freedom to engage in unfair and cruel labor practices, the "right to work", and the faith that people have what they "deserve."
And don't get me started on the way readers of Foucault tend to characterize Bentham...
I've encountered two arguments against the Stake holder society. The first, which is well addressed in the book, is that some people would waste their $80,000. I agree with the authors that relatively few would waste their money, and that many would be much better off than they are now. I find that people who make this criticism are not themselves suggesting an alternative remedy to the drastic disparity in wealth in America, and are not even aware of it. In many cases, they profess a belief that there is no hunger in this country, that people only suffer if they don't work, and that everyone has a chance to make it.
The second argument I've encountered is that charity must be done "privately," that is, without the government. In some cases, advocates of private charity support huge organizations known for as much corruption and inefficiency as any government, real or imagined. In other cases, they support only one-on-one charity without any intervening (or skilled, organized, or powerful) agency. Often in supporting these charities, government -haters make clear that they do know that hunger exists in America, if not that people working 60 hours a week can qualify for food stamps (temporarily, of course).
Sometimes supporters of private charity argue that the way to help is to teach entrepreneurism, apparently oblivious to the pertinent absence of capital. Other times they argue for simply giving fish instead of fishing skills. After all, this is good for the giver, and the poor will always be with us.
Why do private and public charity need to be in conflict? I give some tiny amounts to organizations and to people I meet on the street, and I simultaneously argue for living wage laws, campaign finance reform, an end to corporate welfare and waste on weapons, spies, highways, and subsidies for cutters of national forests. I will now argue for a Stake holder society without feeling any conflict with dropping some canned food in a basket or helping build Habitat for Humanity houses.
If private charity were doing the job, no one would propose government charity (and vice versa). And a lot of what is proposed amounts to government neutrality. Many of our taxes are regressive. Our services are unevenly distributed, notably in education. And we have the money. Just yesterday (May 6, 1999) we threw an extra $13 billion at the Pentagon. That kind of money could end many debates over education by providing better schools in poor counties and cities. Our cities routinely give huge tax-breaks to companies that move to certain areas promising jobs that no one ever bothers to make sure are actually provided. These funds could be better spent.
And isn't it important that the top one percent of wealthy people in the U.S. could end poverty and still live like emperors? Need I be selfish and hypocritical and out-of-line to mention this fact. I don't think so. I cannot myself reach into my pocket and end poverty. I would if I could. By all means, let's have lots of private charity and local assistance. But let's think bigger than that too.
A truly novel idea.......1999-08-24
An interesting - and new - idea. But, oh, the side effects!.......1999-05-17
A few ants of the drone caste heard what the worker said and were morally outraged. They convinced their brother drones to force the colony to share its grain with the cicada and all its relatives. "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs," they said. For several years the drones ran the colony in the new, moral, way. The cicadas and the ants all nearly starved to death. Equally.
The drones of another colony, who agreed with the moral claim of the cicadas, pondered the sad fate of first colony. "The worker was right; the cicada made its own choices and had no moral claim on the ants' store of grain," they said. "But not everyone gets a fair start. To fix this, we will give everyone a share of the grain at the beginning of the summer, not at the end. Then at the end of the summer everyone will pay back the share he or she got at the beginning, plus interest. And those who do well and have extra grain will pay back extra to make up for those who don't have enough."
The cicadas thought this was a great idea. The workers weren't so sure. All that summer, the cicadas sang sweetly, the workers gathered grain (but not too much since they knew they'd have to give away any extra), and the drones watched. That winter they all nearly starved to death. Equally.
Average customer rating: |
Stakeholders, The Environment And Society (New Perspectives in Research on Corporate Sustainability Series)
Manufacturer: Edward Elgar Publishing ProductGroup: Book Binding: Hardcover Similar Items: ASIN: 1843764598 |
Average customer rating:
|
The Stakeholder Strategy: Profiting from Collaborative Business Relationships
Ann Svendsen Manufacturer: Berrett-Koehler Publishers ProductGroup: Book Binding: Hardcover Similar Items:
ASIN: 1576750477 |
Book Description
In today's networked, highly competitive, and global economy, value is created collaboratively between a company and its stakeholders -- employees, investors, customers, suppliers, and communities. "The Stakeholder Strategy" presents a new approach to management that is focused on collaboration. It addresses concernes aobut the bottom line (can collaboration increase profits?) and societal pressures to improve overall quality of life. It also includes a practical step-by-step guide, which companies can use to forge a network of powerful and profitable collaborative stakeholder relationships.Customer Reviews:
Highly Recommended!.......2001-06-02
The Mansion In The Mist.......2000-10-12
A framework for a holistic approach to stakeholder relations.......2000-06-13
Average customer rating: |
Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy. Eleventh Ed
Anne T. Lawrence Manufacturer: see notes for publisher info ProductGroup: Book Binding: Hardcover ASIN: B000M4UMB6 |
Average customer rating: |
The Corporation and Its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings
Manufacturer: University of Toronto Press ProductGroup: Book Binding: Hardcover ASIN: 0802043003 |
Book Description
There is an active debate over whether the traditional purpose of the corporation - to maximize profits and financial value for the benefit of shareholders - can adequately encompass the interests of all other participants or stakeholders in the corporation's activities. Since a corporation cannot operate optimally without the support of its most important stakeholders, particularly its employees and customers, finding ways of incorporating responsiveness to stakeholder needs is vital for corporate management and governance.
This anthology is designed to sharpen the debate about the role and purpose of the corporation. The debate includes such fundamental questions as: Who should be considered stakeholders? Which stakeholder interests should a corporation take into account? How should stakeholder interests be balanced against shareholder objectives (such as profits)? What changes should be made in corporate decision making and governance to reflect these new interests?
This collection of seminal articles, is divided into three parts: Shareholders and Stakeholders; Morality, Ethics and Stakeholder Theory; and Stakeholder Theory and Management Performance.
The articles date from 1916 to 1997, and are drawn from North American and European authors.
Managers as well as researchers will find this collection presented will stimulate their thinking on the role of the corporation and its responsiveness to stakeholder interests.
The volume is funded in part by a grant from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
Average customer rating: |
Gender Mainstreaming in Information and Communications: A Reference Manual for Governments and Other Stakeholders (Gender Management System Series)
Joan Ross Frankson Manufacturer: Commonwealth Secretariat ProductGroup: Book Binding: Paperback ASIN: 0850926025 |
Book Description
A Reference Manual for Governments and Other Stakeholders
Average customer rating: |
Optimization Methods for a Stakeholder Society: A Revolution in Economic Thinking by Multi-objective Optimization (Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications)
W.K. Brauers Manufacturer: Springer ProductGroup: Book Binding: Hardcover ASIN: 1402076819 |
Book Description
For both public and private managers, the book Optimization Methods for a Stakeholder Society is today's key to answer the problem of a sustainable development world. This world has to take into account the meaning of all stakeholders involved and has to reconcile a number of objectives, such as economic growth, employment and preservation of the ecosystem. Traditional methods, such as cost-benefit, are outmoded as they translate all these objectives into monetary costs, a materialistic approach. On the contrary, objectives have rather to stick to their own units, eventually indicators.Books:
Recommended Books