Book Description
Updated line-by-line and focusing throughout on the dual themes of problem solving and community/police collaboration and partnerships, this comprehensive text provides law enforcement students and police professionals with a career-focused up-to-the minute look at effective community policing. After presenting an historical perspective and the philosophy behind the movement, police veteran Linda S. Miller and renowned criminal justice educator Kären M. Hess turn to the practical strategies and essential skills needed to implement realistic, workable problem solving within communities today. And, because changes in technology and society continually present new challenges to police officers, COMMUNITY POLICING: PARTNERSHIPS FOR PROBLEM SOLVING (formerly titled THE POLICE IN THE COMMUNITY: STRATEGIES FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY) illustrates the application of procedures to the latest issues, preparing students and professionals to understand the opportunities and responsibilities now faced by the police and the community they serve.
Customer Reviews:
I shot this book then burned what was left.......2006-05-08
I was forced to read this book for the written portion of my Sergeant promotional exam. I have a BA in Criminal Justice and a BA in Psychology. This is the worst textbook I have ever read. The authors have so little information to impart, that they quote themselves from other chapters! After sifting through the c_ _ p in this book, I now have a clear understanding of what community policing actually is: People are too stupid to fix their own problems and are unable to rely on their elected leaders, so the police must pick up the slack. In this book, you could just as easily substitute Mail Woman, Garbage Man, or Cable TV Repairman for Police Man. As you read, you find out that you have been a terrible police officer. Further, the only way to fix yourself is to read this book and internalize its junk. Simply put, community policing is a way for your department to get federal funding. Next time someone asks you to fix a social problem, tell them that their elected local representative, home owner's association, town council, or governer is responsible for those concerns, not the police. Though, you will be glad to lock up their neighbor for kicking his dog.
Book Description
A favorite among law students and professors alike, the Examples & Explanations series is ideal for studying, reviewing and testing your understanding through application of hypothetical examples. Authored by leading professors with extensive classroom experience, Examples & Explanations titles offer hypothetical questions in the subject area, complemented by detailed explanations that allow you to test your knowledge of the topic, and compare your own analysis.
Customer Reviews:
No good for adjudicative procedure.......2007-04-05
I am a fool for the E&E, I never take an exam without going through an E&E first. So I bought this book without a second thought, opened it up and was pretty bummed to find out it only covers investigative procedure. My class is adjudicative procedure, and I'm not going to find any damn help from this book. If your class is the same, I wouldn't buy this-- get the Advanced CrimPro Nutshell instead.
Sucks compared to the other Examples and Explanation books.......2007-03-04
I really like Examples and Explanations (e.g. CivPro and Contracts). But this book wasn't useful to me at all. It feels more like a survey article in a newspaper than a helpful commercial source.
My professor said that only commercial source that was any good re Constitutional Criminal Procedure is the book by Lafave and Israel.
Decent for exam review.......2007-01-09
The E&E series can be a little uneven. (The Civil Procedure book is better than most Civ Pro casebooks for actually learning Civ Pro; the Criminal Law book has some outright errors.)
This one's better than average--not a substitute for doing your regular reading, but good for exam review. My only complaint is that many of the "examples" are real cases, so they don't test you much if you already did your other reading.
A must for criminal procedure. .......2006-04-12
This supplement is a must. It will save you time and energy. Bloom and Brodin give clean definitions for 4th amendment, 5th, and 6th. A friend of mine who passed the July 05 CA Bar (on the first attempt), used this book as her sole preparation for criminal procedure essay section. The checklist located in the appendix will ensure that you will not miss any issues.
Great supplement but bad teacher.......2004-12-13
I just used this book to help me study for my CrimPro exam. I thought it was very, very helpful, but only because I had read my casebook and attended class all semester. Unlike Glannon's CivPro E&E (which is a MUST-BUY for any 1L), this book would not have been valuable if I had opened it during the semester; it was only valuable before my exam as a review. It does not provide insight into why the Supreme Court decided certain things; it simply gives us the rules the Court spat out with a miniscule amount of justification, if any. Your casebook and professor would likely discuss the reasons why the Court decided the way it did and why the concurring or dissenting justices reasoned the way they did.
Thus this book does not give you a complete view of Criminal Procedure. But that is not what we are supposed to expect from study aids and supplements such as this. For what this book is supposed to be, a supplement/complement to the work you've already done, it is excellent. So make sure if you buy this that you are buying it for the right reasons. If you need a book explaining CrimPro in detail, then you should probably read your casebook.
I do have to say, however, that the hypotheticals are excellent and give you a good feel for what kinds of essays you might encounter on your exam. They allow you to walk through your analysis, exactly how your professor would expect you to, from start to finish.
Book Description
Offering a unique look at subcategories of delinquent youth, primarily suburban youth, Wooden/Blazak use qualitative research strategies to explore how basically good kids can move from the fringes of society to delinquent activities. Accordingly, this text investigates everything from the harmless life of the mall rat to the volatile and dangerous world of skinheads, Satanists, and tagger crews, as well as the culture in the California Youth Authority. This new edition includes more information about girls and different races, as well as the latest information about group typologies. The author quotes from the popular media to highlight his points and make conceptual material relevant to students.
Customer Reviews:
Good Subject Matter With Outdated Statistics.......2005-05-09
This book contains a wealth of information on the deviant youth subculture. Unfortunately, it uses grossly outdated statistics and research. There is no excuse for claiming to discuss and explore the current youth subculture using research from the mid 1960s and statistics from the early 1980s.
For anyone studying adolescents, stay clear of this book.......1999-11-12
This book is grossly misinformed. Wooden makes no attempt to study his subject. Rather, he regurgitates things read from letters and pamphlets. He describes one stereotype after another and makes very broad generalizations that would get a professional in trouble. In particular, his chapters on Satanism and the Punk movement sound just like a Donahue episode. He never even speaks to a punk. Instead, in his chapter on Punks, he reads letters from parents and others who have been affected in some way by Punk, obviously biasing the research. That is only one chapter I could pick apart. In conclusion, Wooden is very out of touch with the real issues being presented. I am very angry I bought this book and am surprised he was even published. The fact that he is an award-winning author makes me want to become a writer.
A LOOK INSIDE OUR YOUTH.......1999-06-11
THIS BOOK IS VERY INFORMATIVE. ANYONE WHO WORKS, OR IS INTERESTED INWORKING WITH YOUTH SHOULD READ IT. WHEN I STARTED READING IT I COULD NOT STOP. INETERSTING. HOWEVER, IT IS SOMEWHAT BASIC AND COMMUN KNOLEDGE. WITH NO TRULY INSIGHT INTO THE REASONING.
Must read for anyone working with adolescents.......1998-07-16
I wanted to say that I am glad that I took this class with Dr. Wooden, the author, he gives a lot of insights into the world of the adolescents. He gives definitions that are clearly described so that you know the difference between a delinquent and one that does something because it is the "in thing" to do. Gives a great view and intensive study on the behavior of teenagers today compared to the past decade.
Book Description
The rapid expansion of the American drug court movement is by now a rather well-documented story. Practitioners, politicians, and academics alike acknowledge the profound impact that drug courts have had on the American criminal justice system. From a range of disciplinary perspectives, contributors to this volume seek to make sense of this important judicial innovation.
Since the first drug court was initiated in 1989, more than 1,200 similar courts have been established or are in the planning and implementation stages throughout the United States. Mostly they offer low-level drug offenders a court-monitored treatment alternative to the normal adjudication process. Informed by a uniquely therapeutic judicial philosophy, drug courts depart considerably from the practices and procedures of a typical criminal court. Prosecutors and defense counsel, for example, play much reduced roles. Often lawyers are not even present during regular drug court sessions. Instead, the main courtroom drama is between judge and client, both of whom speak openly and freely in the drug court setting. Often accompanying the client is a treatment provider, who advises the judge and reviews the client's progress in treatment. Court sessions are characterized by expressive, and sometimes tearful, testimonies about the recovery process, and are punctuated with applause from those in attendance. Once completing the program, clients participate in colorful graduation ceremonies, which involve emotional speeches from graduating clients, the issuing of graduation certificates, and visits from the media and other local luminaries.
Building on his own earlier book on drug courts, this edited volume extends the scope of theoretical and empirical analyses in interesting and important ways. It investigates pertinent questions about punitive practices, civil rights, rehabilitative practices, cultural contexts, and competing institutional interests, all of them raised by the theory and practice of these courts. Assembled in the volume is the necessary range of scholars and practitioners prepared to address these questions. Contributors include five sociologists, a law professor, a judge, two lawyers, a political theorist, and a criminologist. Though wide ranging with respect to the diversity of disciplinary approaches represented here, the volume maintains an analytical concentration on drug courts and on the important practical, philosophical, and jurisprudential consequences of this unique form of therapeutic jurisprudence.
CONTENTS Preface. Contributors. Part I: Empirical Explorations. 1. Theory and Practice in the Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court, William D. McColl. 2. Systemic Constraints on the Implementation of a Northeastern Drug Court, Elaine M. Wolf. 3. West Coast Drug Courts: Getting Offenders Morally Involved in the Criminal Justice Process, Sara Steen. 4. The Denver Drug Court and Its Unintended Consequences, Morris B. Hoffman. 5. Separated by an Uncommon Law: Drug Courts in Great Britain and America, James L. Nolan, J 7: Part II: Theoretical Assessments. 6. The Adversary System and Attorney Role in the Drug Treatment Court Movement, Richard C. Boldt. 7. Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Drug Treatment Courts: 'Integrating Law and Science, John Terrence A. Rosenthal. 8. Drug Treatment Courts: A Traditional Perspective, Susan Meld Shell. 9. The Drug Court Movement: An Analysis of Tacit Assumptions, James J. Chriss. 10. Drug Control and the Ascendancy of Britain's Therapeutic Culture, Frank Furedi. 11. Drug Courts, the Judge, and the Rehabilitative Ideal, Philip Bean. Index
Customer Reviews:
Snapshots of the Trial.......2006-12-23
Joseph Bosco is a journalist who has written other books on true crime. He tells the story as he sees it. The `Acknowledgments' thanks the prosecution team, the defense team, the Sheriff's Office, the LAPD, the media reporters, and many, many others. This very readable book lacks an index and is not a good reference. But it is a unique eyewitness account of the trial. Chapter 21 explains "reasonable doubt". The State's case must "exclude all reasonable hypothesis of innocence". Any scenario supported by evidence that could exculpate the defendant creates reasonable doubt that requires a verdict of not guilty. Peter Bozanich said the media was biased against Simpson (p.258). They never criticized the conduct of the prosecution team and a poorly presented case (p.259). The jury followed the evidence and the law. What is the psychological problem of those who hate O. J. Simpson but pass over Timothy McVeigh (p.261)?
The `Introduction' says the book will present "snapshots" of the crime, the trial, and the events. It will probably be different to what you have read. Bosco was amazed by the taped and edited segments of the trial on television because it was different from what he saw in the courtroom (p.xv). This book will not cover broad aspects of the trial but with the pivotal "facts" of the case. In effect, it is why they voted "not guilty" (pp.xvi-xvii). Bosco's past knowledge of a "blood case" murder made him more knowledgeable; he was a friend of Dr. Henry Lee, the "pre-eminent forensic scientist". Bosco says Detective Vannatter did not call the designated Deputy District Attorney but Marcia Clark (p.xix). No explanation given.
Chapter 1 asks if the case against OJ was "almost too perfect" because it could be a frame-up (p.1)? Chapter 2 tells why the grand jury was dismissed - it would not indict on murder (pp.8-9). Chapter 4 comments on the DA's arrogance. Office politics eliminated the best prosecutors (p.22). The LAPD's rating is on page 23. [Did you see that on TV?] The public did not see all that happened (p.40). Reporters were afraid (p.42). Chapter 7 notes the blunders of the prosecution (p.57). The jurors did not believe in a lone killer (p.63). What happened in the court was not on TV (p.68). Chapter 8 lists the mysteries about the murders. Why was the security gate left open (p.73)? The Italian shoes were traced, "none to OJ" (p.75). What about the bloody fingerprints on those glasses (p.76)? The Medical Examiner's autopsies created a problem for the Prosecution (Chapter 10). There are questions about the blood spatter (pp.104-106).
The lack of extensive physical damage on OJ is an argument for his innocence (Chapter 11). Allen Park didn't see the Bronco, or Kato's car either (p.151). Chapter 12 has his comments on Nicole's family. Chapter 13 discusses the status of the blood evidence. The gloves didn't fit (p.167). Bosco blames Marcia Clark for losing the case (Chapter 16). What is the significance of Fuhrman's pointing to the glove (p.219)? There is a theory about planting the glove (p.224). There is more about Fuhrman's importance on page 228. Was there a hidden secret for the prosecution team (p.238)? Was the trial an exercise in Public Relations (p.244)?
The Trial of O.J. Simpson was the most publicized event since the Washington hearings on Watergate and Nixon's impeachment. Why did the corporate media push it so much? Was it a distraction to avoid the problems of NAFTA and similar economic attacks on the middle class? George Orwell's novel "1984" explains how sensational news is used to distract people from events in the real world.
A PROBLEM WITH EVIDENCE= A PROBLEM WITH FAIRY TALES.......2002-03-11
People have talked about how O.J.(one reason) got off was because of his fame, thier craving to know someone famous to a apart, to be able to talk to their friends and tell them stories. This is Joseph Bosco. At times I felt I was reading the Joseph Bosco and the Trial of The Century. Here is a nobody who get lucky with the draw of the cards and gets a seat. He his with great authors as Dominick Dunne * Joe Ginness. I think he knows from the start they will speak the truth and has to go into another direction
..into the O.J Camp..rub shoulders there...more stories when he gets home or with others he can make an impression on. So he goes sneaking off playing their game..no wonder he was called a "sandbager" by the late Robin Clark, who also befriended him into their group. He was playing both sides of the fence.
I had watched the O.J. Trial almost everyday..yes I was addictive I guess. I have now been reading many books (except Marcia & Chris-I saw enough of that terrible duo) Reading everyones side and placing the pieces together.
Joseph Boscos" Book is a Fairy tale and should be in the Fiction part of the store. He repeats things especially in the end of the book when he hasn't any notes to copy (of others) like he was a fly on the wall in all these conversations NO Quotations .."Somethings wrong" Mr.Bosco KEEPS telling us he was the "Daily Courtroom Reporter." Well I have been in many a class where students were there EVERYDAY...and yet knew nothng about what was going on when the finals came ...and Failed..just like this book did.
Blinded by Celebrity.......2001-07-01
Joseph Bosco had a permanent seat at the O.J. Simpson trial,so you would think he would have something new to add.Unfortunately,he was so mezmerized by Mr. Simpson and his attorneys,that he must have forgotten to take notes during the prosecution phase of this trial,so what the reader ends up with is a rehash of the Dream Team's smoke and mirror act.One of the most telling statements arrives early in the book,when Mr. Bosco states that he can't understand why when he went back to his hotel every night and turned on the TV,Mr. Simpson didn't look sincere,as he claims,he apparently did when you watched him in person.The camera never lies,Mr. Bosco.It always knows when you're telling the truth and when you're lying.That's why some actors become stars,and others fade away after one movie.This is a great book for anyone who either can't or won't remember what the evidence really was.
Why OJ Simpson is truly "Not Guilty".......2000-04-27
The author was one of the few to sit through the entire trial. This book is a personal account of what he thinks. He wondered about the guilt or innocence of OJ, and I would like to answer his question.
The testimony of the two witnesses who cannot lie say that OJ Simpson is not guilty.
Blood and flesh were found under Nicole Brown's fingernails; the blood type did not match OJ (or Nicole or Ron). Ron Goldman walked to work, worked out, and practiced karate; his hands showed bruises from punching someone in the face or head more than once. OJ had no scratches or bruises on his hands, arms, face, or body: he could not have been a lone murderer.
The newspapers said that when the bodies were found after 12:15 AM their red blood was trickling down the sidewalk. The crime scene pictures printed in the National Enquirer showed the red blood. This says they were freshly killed, around 11:30, because their blood would be black and clotted if dead for over an hour (as in the Borden Murders).
The above physical evidence proves OJ Simpson to be innocent of these murders. Some say the 25 to 30 stab wounds on Ron Goldman suggest an emotional frenzy from a personal enemy, and Nicole Brown was the innocent bystander. The book "Killing Time" is the first and only objective book (arguments for both sides) to discuss all the evidence.
I hope that those who want to know the facts will read this, and reconsider any prejudgments that they made in June 1994.
Saying the Truth.......2000-04-26
J. Bosco's book is a personal account of what he witnessed as a witness of the complete trial. He wondered if OJ was really innocent.
The testimony of the two witnesses who cannot lie say that OJ Simpson is not guilty.
Blood and flesh were found under Nicole Brown's fingernails; the blood type did not match OJ (or Nicole or Ron). Ron Goldman walked to work, worked out, and practiced karate; his hands showed bruises from punching someone in the face or head more than once. OJ had no scratches or bruises on his hands, arms, face, or body: he could not have been a lone murderer.
The newspapers said that when the bodies were found after 12:15 AM their red blood was trickling down the sidewalk. The crime scene pictures printed in the National Enquirer showed the red blood. This says they were freshly killed, around 11:30, because their blood would be black and clotted if dead for over an hour (as in the Borden Murders).
The above physical evidence proves OJ Simpson to be innocent of these murders. Some say the 25 to 30 stab wounds on Ron Goldman suggest an emotional frenzy from a personal enemy, and Nicole Brown was the innocent bystander. The book "Killing Time" is the first and only objective book (arguments for both sides) to discuss all the evidence.
I hope that those who want to know the facts will read this, and reconsider any prejudgments that they made in June 1994.
Book Description
Available for convenient bundling with any Wadsworth Criminal Procedure text or for purchase as a stand-alone item, this state-specific guide assists students in their exploration of New York procedure laws and cases and features chapter introductions, overviews of codes and implications, and exercises for New York-specific penal codes.
Book Description
How innovative judges and attorneys are transforming American courts.
Public confidence in American criminal courts is at an all-time low. Victims, communities, and even offenders view courts as unable to respond adequately to complex social and legal problems including drugs, prostitution, domestic violence, and quality-of-life crime. Even many judges and attorneys think that the courts produce assembly-line justice.
Increasingly embraced by even the most hard-on-crime jurists, problem-solving courts offer an effective alternative. As documented by Greg Berman and John Feinblatt—both of whom were instrumental in setting up New York's Midtown Community Court and Red Hook Community Justice Center, two of the nation's premier models for problem-solving justice—these alternative courts reengineer the way everyday crime is addressed by focusing on the underlying problems that bring people into the criminal justice system to begin with.
The first book to describe this cutting-edge movement in detail, Good Courts features, in addition to the Midtown and Red Hook models, an in-depth look at Oregon's Portland Community Court and reviews the growing body of evidence that the problem-solving approach to justice is indeed producing positive results around the country.
Customer Reviews:
Great summary of problem solving court movement.......2005-08-09
The book is a quick read, easily completed on a long flight. It focuses primarily on the New York experience but includes a national historical perspective. Problem solving courts represent the greatest sea change in criminal justice of this generation. They are smart on crime. This book explains why we should bring this model "to scale".
My only objection to the book concerns the authors indifference to community supervision and their dismissal of probation. This may be uniquely New York City issues, because probation and law enforcement are vibrant and critical members of problem solving court teams across the country. The drug court model works best when the strength of community supervision supports recovery in the offender's community. Drug Courts are about accountability, public safety, and recovery. Community supervision specializes in those specific goals.
Book Description
Although this text covers the traditional topics of police, courts, and corrections, it is distinctive in its coverage of plea bargaining, legal and ethical values, and capital punishment. This text is unique in its critical thinking approach: student as decision maker, student as problem solver, student as working professional. Pat Anderson examines the system from the point of view of the men and women who run it; from the cop on the beat to the prison warden to the Supreme Court justice. The reader steps into their shoes to weigh the ethical ramifications and often contradictory issues that surround the choices they make.
Books:
- Compact Houses: Architecture for the Environment
- Conducting Child Custody Evaluations: A Comprehensive Guide
- Constitutional Law: Essay and Multiple-choice Questions and Answers (Siegel's)
- Constitutional Law: Principles And Policies (Introduction to Law Series)
- Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science (College Version), Eighth Edition
- Designing Brand Identity: A Complete Guide to Creating, Building, and Maintaining Strong Brands
- Distressed Debt Analysis: Strategies for Speculative Investors
- Effective Oracle Database 10g Security by Design
- Energy Autonomy: The Economic, Social and Technological Case for Renewable Energy
- Every Landlord's Tax Deduction Guide
Books Index
Books Home
Recommended Books
- The Titan's Curse
- Seduced by Moonlight
- Introducing Biological Rhythms: A Primer on the Temporal Organization of Life, with Implications for
- Magnetism
- Oil Pastel: Materials and Techniques for Today's Artist
- Public School Law: Teacher's and Student's Rights, Fifth Edition
- Rabbit Handbook: A Family Guide To Buying, Keeping & Breeding
- Anselm Kiefer: Heaven And Earth
- Japan the Art of Living: A Sourcebook of Japanese Style for the Western Home
- Lewis and Clark: Pioneering Naturalists
Social Policy
| Government
| Nonfiction
| Subjects
| Books
Police Patrol: Operations and Management, Third Edition
Briefs of Leading Cases in Law Enforcement
Criminal Investigation, with Student Simulation CD
Multicultural Law Enforcement: Strategies for Peacekeeping in a Diverse Society (4th Edition)
Effective Police Supervision
