Lessons for Introducing Fractions: Grades 4-5 (Teaching Arithmetic)

Lessons for Introducing Fractions: Grades 4-5 (Teaching Arithmetic)
Average customer rating:

Introducing Fractions

Wonderful approach!

Lessons for Introducing Fractions: Grades 4-5 (Teaching Arithmetic)
Marilyn Burns
Manufacturer: Math Solutions Publications
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback

General | Education | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
Elementary School | Education | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books | General | Reading
Mathematics | Specific Skills | Education | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
All Titles | Qualifying Textbooks - Fall 2007 | Stores | Books
Nonfiction | Qualifying Textbooks - Fall 2007 | Stores | Books
Professional | Qualifying Textbooks - Fall 2007 | Stores | Books
Similar Items:

LESSONS FOR EXTENDING MULTIPLICATION: Lessons for Extending Multiplication to Grades 4-5 (Teaching Arithmetic)

Lessons for Introducing Division: Grades 3-4 (The Teaching Arithmetic)

Lessons for Algebraic Thinking: Grades 3-5 (Lessons for Algebraic Thinking Series)

Lessons for Extending Fractions: Grade 5 (Teaching Arithmetic)

LESSONS FOR DECIMALS AND PERCENTS: Lessons for Decimals and Percents, Grades 5-6 (Teaching Arithmetic)

ASIN: 0941355330

Product Description

Grades 4 - 5. These lessons provide all students with the foundation they need to experience success with fractions through hands-on investigation of grade level appropriate material. Each lesson provides all the information teachers need to implement it in their class or homes including step-by-step directions, amount of time needed, materials required, classroom vignettes, samples of student work, and a discussion of the math underlying the lesson.

Customer Reviews:

Introducing Fractions.......2007-05-28

I had used this book prior to buying it. It has an assortment of wonderful activities to use in order to help your students/children understand the concept of fractions. It also helps the instructor to know how to guide the discussion during the activities.

Wonderful approach!.......2006-12-02

We homeschooled for upper elementary grades, and my daughter simply did not "get" fractions. I tried several standard curriculums before investing in this book. By the end of it, my daughter was finally solid on fractions.

Although the book is written for classroom use, it is easily adapted to working one-on-one. It starts out by having the teacher and student create their own sets of manipulatives. These are used in subsequent chapters to illustrate and reinforce concepts. Multiple ways of looking at fractions are explained in each chapter, which helps a child find an approach that works for him or her.

I highly recommend this book for any parent wanting to help a struggling student understand fractions.

Average customer rating:

Irving comes through
Not quite there.
Great Concept, Scattered Delivery
Good Writer Preposterous Story
A pleasant light read.

The Fourth Hand
John Irving
Manufacturer: Random House
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

Contemporary | General | Literature & Fiction | Subjects | Books

Literary | General | Literature & Fiction | Subjects | Books

Trying to Save Piggy Sneed
A Son of the Circus
The Imaginary Girlfriend (Ballantine Reader's Circle)
The Water-Method Man
Until I Find You: A Novel

ASIN: 0375506276
Release Date: 2001-07-03

Amazon.com's Best of 2001

Like anything newsworthy, miracles of medicine and technology inevitably make their way out of the headlines and become the stuff of fiction. In recent years readers have been absorbed by media accounts of a transplanted hand, an experiment that ultimately ended in amputation. Medical ethicists reason that a hand, unlike a heart or a liver--essential organs conveniently housed out of sight--is in full view and one of a pair, arguably dispensable. In his 10th novel, however, John Irving undertakes to imagine just such a transplant, which involves a donor, a recipient, a surgeon, a particular Green Bay Packer fan, and the remarkable left hand that brings them together.

Television reporter Patrick Wallingford becomes a story himself when he loses his hand to a caged lion while in India covering a circus. The moment is captured live on film, and Patrick (who wears a "perpetual but dismaying smile--the look of someone who knows he's met you before but can't recall the exact occasion") is henceforth known as the lion guy. Before long, plans are made to equip Patrick with a new hand. Doctor Nicholas M. Zajac, superstar surgeon, indefatigable dog-poop scooper, runner, and part-time father, is poised to perform the operation. But the donor--or rather the widow of the donor--has a few stipulations. Doris Clausen wants to meet the one-handed reporter before the procedure, and insists on visitation rights afterward. Irving weaves these characters and a panoply of others together in a smart, funny, readable narrative. Often farcical, The Fourth Hand is ultimately something more: a tender chronicle of the redemptive power of love. --Victoria Jenkins

Book Description

The Fourth Hand asks an interesting question: "How can anyone identify a dream of the future?" The answer: "Destiny is not imaginable, except in dreams or to those in love."

While reporting a story from India, a New York television journalist has his left hand eaten by a lion; millions of TV viewers witness the accident. In Boston, a renowned hand surgeon awaits the opportunity to perform the nation's first hand transplant; meanwhile, in the distracting aftermath of an acrimonious divorce, the surgeon is seduced by his housekeeper. A married woman in Wisconsin wants to give the one-handed reporter her husband's left hand-that is, after her husband dies. But the husband is alive, relatively young, and healthy.

This is how John Irving's tenth novel begins; it seems, at first, to be a comedy, perhaps a satire, almost certainly a sexual farce. Yet, in the end, The Fourth Hand is as realistic and emotionally moving as any of Mr. Irving's previous novels-including The World According to Garp, A Prayer for Owen Meany, and A Widow for One Year-or his Oscar-winning screenplay of The Cider House Rules.

The Fourth Hand is characteristic of John Irving's seamless storytelling and further explores some of the author's recurring themes-loss, grief, love as redemption. But this novel also breaks new ground; it offers a penetrating look at the power of second chances and the will to change.

Download Description

While reporting a story from India, a New York television journalist has his left hand eaten by a lion; millions of TV viewers witness the accident. What happens next is the subject of Irving's tenth novel, which offers a penetrating look at the power of second chances and the will to change.

Customer Reviews:

Irving comes through.......2007-09-23

One of John Irving's best endeavors, with an un-Irving like ending. Irving's descriptions are vivid and his storytelling becomes nearly poetic in much of this prose, however - I agree with others that this is an extremely readable encounter with Irving and would be good for first time Irving readers as well as those of us who persevered through thick and thin along the way.

Not quite there........2007-04-07

I really like a lot of John Irving's early work like "The world according to Garp" and "The Ciderhouse rules".
Sadly this book is more simirlar to his recent book "Until I find you". Similar in that the characters are not believable and the whole plot centres around a man who is(again not believably) irresistible to women and thus has lots of graphically boring sex.Sadly because it confirms that Irving's best work is long behind him.
Skip this book and read Irving's earlier work.

Great Concept, Scattered Delivery.......2007-01-26

I am a big fan of John Irving, his unique characters and his raw sense of humor. I loved A Prayer for Owen Meany and The Hotel New Hampshire and recommend these books HIGHLY. However, this book was all over the map for me. The novel takes us, in the beginning, through the lives of Dr. Zajac and Patrick Wallingford, and I had the expectation that there would be some kind of meaninful collision between their worlds. While there is their obvious interaction (the hand surgery), it seems Dr. Zajac's character was used perhaps to contrast the meandering and listless Wallingford character; We have a man who struggles to connect and one who can't seem to connect. But I was surprised to meet the last page of this novel and find that Dr. Zajac was fairly insignificant in the last half of the book.

I felt that the wandering thoughts and parenthetical statements were gratuitous in this novel, as was the foretelling. These are thing that I usually like about Irving's style, but it was overdone in this particular work.

That being said, Irving had some elegant prose, as usual. I admire the concept of this novel, which beyond the quirky circumstances, addresses the reality that our news is filtered through marketing hacks, is trunkated into soundbytes and selected for visual appeal to an inattentive audience. The more provocative stories are left in the wake of the grandiose.

For this, and for his amazing talent, my hat's off to John Irving.

Good Writer Preposterous Story.......2006-07-25

Irving starts out with an inviting plot but gets lost in a ridculous story. Hard to like or empathize with characters who make reckless decisions and do stupid things. The main character seems to be wondering around in the boys locker room and never finds his way out. Suspend reality takes on a new meaning with this story. Irving can do so much better.

A pleasant light read........2006-07-07

I have re-read this book so many times! It is highly readable, without as many of the darker undercurrents that Irving's other work has. It also has more adult content, with discussions of divorce and sex and teen pregnancy, as well as more frequent use of expletives.

If you are a fan of Irving because you like his heavy-handed, multi-layered themes, then this probably isn't a book you'll enjoy very much. If you're looking for a book that will serve as a good "introduction" to Irving -- I don't think this book is for you.

But if you're looking for a fun, quick read, with well-drawn characters, a unique plot, and a fast-paced story, I recommend this book.

Taking With the Left Hand: Enneagram Craze, People of the Bookmark, & The Mouravieff "Phenomenon"

Average customer rating:

Interesting For Background, But Loaded Down With Too Much Bias
What difference does it make?
P's most mixed offering-but essential for any Burton student
The Arch-Absurd: There is no Fun in Fundamentalism
A Must Read For Any Spiritual Seeker

Taking With the Left Hand: Enneagram Craze, People of the Bookmark, & The Mouravieff "Phenomenon"
William Patrick Patterson , and Barbara C. Allen
Manufacturer: Arete Communications
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback

General | Essays | Literature & Fiction | Subjects | Books

General | Social Sciences | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

Parapsychology | Occult | Religion & Spirituality | Subjects | Books
Similar Items:

Eating the I: An Account of the Fourth Way--The Way of Transformation in Ordinary Life (In Search of the Self) Revised/Expanded (In Search of the Self)
Struggle of the Magicians
Voices in the Dark: Esoteric, Occult & Secular Voices in Nazi-Occupied Paris, 1940-44
Heart without Measure: Gurdjieff Work with Madame de Salzmann
Exchanges Within: Questions from Everyday Life Selected from Gurdjieff Group Meetings with John Pentland in California 1955-1984

ASIN: 1879514109

Book Description

A lucid and compelling account of conflict and charlatanism surrounding the Gurdjieff Work, one of the most important alternative spiritual movements of our day. The first book to explore one of the taboo subjects of our time—spiritual theft, distortion and appropriation—Patterson details and documents how a principal symbol of the teaching has been stolen and commercialized by the so-called enneagram community; how Robert Burton, founder of the Fellowship of Friends, distorted the teaching; and how Mouravieff, a Russian esotericist, plagiarized and appropriated it.

Customer Reviews:

Interesting For Background, But Loaded Down With Too Much Bias.......2007-01-28

This book is moderately informative for those interested in studying the esoteric and the 4th Way, BUT...it is essentially a polemic written by a Gurdjieff purist. There is room in the world for polemics, but what makes this one particularly annoying is its criticism for individuals and groups for not being connected to the "authentic" traditions of Gurdjieff and his school. Any study of these "traditions" by someone who is not committed to accept them as authentic from the beginning reveals them to contain the same "validity" as the teachings that Blavatsky "discovered" in Tibet, or Heindel encountered in Germany, or countless other examples.

There is something almost comical about criticisms of groups for not being linked to an authentic tradition when there is no historical evidence that Gurdjieff was connected to these himself. There is definitely something comical about these groups being referred to as "personality cults." If there is ever an example of a personality cult in the history of modern esoteric movements, the "classic" 4th Way is it. Gurdjieff left behind a nearly indecipherable body of teachings, much of which reads like gibberish, and a tiny remnant of followers who excused his often abusive and capricious behavior by explaining that he was "testing" them.

In the end, it makes little difference if any person or group is authentically connected to teachings that were derived from a man who Colin Wilson included in his study of "self-proclaimed" teachers. These groups have just as much of a right to cobble together teachings from assorted estoteric sources and claim them as their own, or as Gurdjieff's true teachings, as he did. That's the beauty of secret, oral traditions, they're beyond criticism in terms of proof of historical lineage.

What difference does it make?.......2005-10-05

Patterson does a good job of exposing those who have cobbled together a successful business dealing in the remnants of the Gurdjieff work. What I found missing though, was any sort of discussion about the effectiveness or results of those group's methods that might explain their success. His assesment amounted mostly to something along the lines of, "they aren't genuine so they can't do any good". I might have found a nobler purpose in the book if he could have named at least one genuine 4th Way School that is active today and is successful in getting results and describe how one evaluates such a school. That would have given the book a more practical reason to be read.

There are those who say that 'the 4th Way is dead' and at this point I am inclined to agree with them. So what if a few religions or philosophies have been put together from the remnants of Gurdjieff's work? It is about as consequential as a few buzzards picking at the corpse of a jackrabbit in the middle of the desert.

What difference does it make now?

P's most mixed offering-but essential for any Burton student.......2005-06-11

real rating 3 1/2 - for Burton students a 5!

I think Patterson has done the 4th way world both a great service and at the same time perpetuated a serius misunderstanding with this book. First the good:

Burton and his bogus 4th Way school have long been in need of a serious de-bunking. It was/is a sham school with undoubtedly a lot of serious students making the best of a bad situation [my brother in law was one for quite a few years] They have none of the movement or meditative practices handed down by any real 4th way groups and have substituted the real goods w/ watered down and poorly digested Ouspensky. And a playing card typology thrown in for good measure!
-----------------------------------------------------------------

As regards the Enneagram material. My first real experience w/ it was in an obscure 4th way school in St. Pete Fl. in the mid-80's.

The Teacher there had observed that our False Personality really only had 9 pairs of reactions. And that our type was better seen through the matrix of the law of 7 [real personality], the laws of 4 and 5 [being] and the Law of 3 [essence]. The typology successfully integrated Ayurvedic Doshas [ Law of 3], Western 4 Element, Chinese 5 Elements and Gurdjieff's 7 Centers.

It was an extremely creative and practical synthesis that is as equally verifiable as anything else in the world of 4th way Psychology. I mention all this only as a background for where the enneagram typologies go wrong, and that Patterson misses this much more [imo] crucial point.
The realtionships of the 9 types to the Centers/Stories is essentially 'off by one'.

The most glaring case is that point 8 [or the si note/ higher intellectual center] is seen as physical, not supramental. This distorts much of the underlying basis of the profile.

Several others points have to a lesser degree been divorced from their real manifestations in G's Centers. The Do note/Sex energy types depicted are replaced w/ a fuzzy mixture of attributions in point 9.

By failing to see the relationship to the centers the enneagram types are in some cases weakened, in others something of a mess.

Patterson is either unaware of all this or more concerned w/ the politics and lineages of Ichazo, Naranjo, Palmer and Co.

That being said several of the types are to my mind presented very accurately despite being divorced from their relationships to the centers and the essence types of Physical, Psychological and Supramental. And I am sure thousands of people have a much better understanding of themselves as a result. Again Patterson seems only to see negatives.

Which points to a curious division in the work. Those who want to keep the 'real teachings' 1/2 hidden, and those like Bennett who spent much their lives trying to spread the ideas publicaly and openly. If Gurdjieff schools w/ an accurate typology had published their information first, the enneagram material out there might be far less mixed in it's value.
-----------------------------------------------------------
As regards the Amiss/Orthodox 4th way connection; I am convinced that Mouravieff understood neither Orthodoxy or the 4thway well.

Their are relationships and discords there and they are worthy of serious study. But while Amiss and Mouravieff are determined to whitewash anything that contradicts their theories. So what one gets from 'Gnosis' vols 1-3 is neither fish nor fowl.

Patterson on the other hand seems, for all his gift as a writer and historical journalist to have taken G's once mentioned line of The 4th way being "independent of all other traditions and hitherto unknown", as a real line of the gospel. I think that saying needs to be put in the context of who he was talking to [in Russia] at the time. Mostly a lot of people who had investigated Theosophy {A true mish-mash likely to lead anyone following it to a cul-de-sac of the lower astral and fully caught by one's own personality}. G. was exaggerating [as he was want to do] to draw a line in the sand for his pupils - between all they had studied before and what he was teaching. As he said later " not necessary when speaking to be exact, just indicate the essence".

Henri Tracol I think is on the right track to evaluating the 4th ways relationship to the Traditional paths saying: "I would like to get rid of this idea that G's teaching sets itself apart from, or in opposition to traditional teachings. In fact he refers to what he calls the 4th way and the 4th way exists in Christianity, in Hinduism, in Islam as well as any other traditional way, Taoist or other which has as its aim to awaken man to the conciousness of his real destiny." [from 'the taste for things which are true' p.93].

One reviewer noted here that: "Amiss is taken to task in a systematic manner in which he compared G's teachings to Eastern Orthodox material. Replete with references he demolishes Amiss's claims. BTW all anyone needs to do is get a copy of O's "In Search of the Mircaluous" a copy of the Philokalia or Theophans works and compare them. You'l see that there is no place for a householder in serious myticism. It's for monks only. St. Theophan was a hermit and monk - hardly someone who understood the way of the householder."

I beg to differ on several points, and while my treatment will take a bit to go through I believe it answers many of the fundamental points Patterson confuses. I use St. Theophan as my sole reference for Orthodoxy only becase as I hope to show he was a primary source for G's worldview. Essentially the framework from which everything would be built and modified from.

Firstly, before St. Theophan became a recluse he was a Bishop, and one intimately concerned w/ the prayer life of his flock [see his brilliant 'the path of prayer' written specifically for lay people]. He was far from a monastic in a cave w/ no clue as to how Orthodox spiritual practices were to be practiced by layman.
St. Theophan's "The Spiritual Life" [perhaps his most accessible and enduring original work] was written to a 16 year old girl who was simply a pious 'layperson'. Orthodox Christianity and the Prayer of the Heart are not for monastics only. This is nonsense. St. Theophan begins in his first letter with," We will not concern ourselves with abstractions or draw up plans or theories; instead our conversation will be on life's everyday occurrences." [Spiritual Life p. 35]
Of course that the deeper levels and teaching of Orthodox spiritual practices has flowered most obviously within monastic life is hardly suprising, much of G's teachings came from monastaries [Buddhist, Sufi, Orthodox Christian and Sarmoung] as well!
I am convinced G. himself read St. Theophan's Spiritual Life as a youth, [he states in his 'Bio' 'Meetings w/ Remarkable Men' something to the effect that he 'studied all the current scientific, religious and psychological books of his day. In Kars, going to a Russian Orthodox School, St. Theophan would have been the bestselling spiritual author around.

Just a few quotes from 'the Spiritual Life [and how to be attuned to it]' should, I think convince all but the most unconvincable that G. not only read St. Theophan but... took it very deeply to heart and became a cornerstone of his world view. And indeed a stepping stone to his burning question.

from p. 44
"Outwardly behave like everyone else, but inwardly guard your heaert from sympathy and attractions" this finds it's echo's in G's , "Outwardly it must be what is best for her and me...internally one should free from considering" [views from the real world]

Again St. Theophan:
Human Life is complex and multi-faceted It has physical, mental and spiritual aspects, Each aspects has it's powers, needs and modes and the exercise and satisfaction of them. But when only all of our powers are in motion and all of our are satisfied does a man live. But when only small number of his powers are in motion...this life is not life. [p. 38 ibid.]

This obviously echoes a cornerstone of the 4th way. Even down to calling one centered life 'not life'.

I wil give one last example of what I belive to be St. Theophans direct and profound impression on G. that I alluded to above.

on page 67 we read from the Recluse: 'For example we know what man is from observations of him, generalizations about him and conclusions we have made. Not being content with this we come up with the question, " What is the significance of man in the sum of creation?" In trying to discover this, one person decides man is the head and crown of creation...' sound familiar?

See again G. in Views p. 42. The parallels are beyond coincidence imo.

All this is to say, that what is unique to G. probably comes from the Sarmoung and his application of Hypnosis on many 'guinea pigs' curing them of their addictions in as a cover for his researches. The rest is more or less common esoteric currency of every tradition to be found from Greece to China. Organized in a unique way albeit, but other than the sacred laws and specific terminology it is a cut and paste job of a very high and special order.

St. Theophan does the same thing, but relying on Orthodox sources almost exclusively. Patterson misses almost all of this in his quest to debunk Amiss. Where Amiss and his teacher go astray is taking G's 'esoteric Chritianity' too seriously [in the same way Patterson has w/ the uniqueness of the 4th way].

The 4th way [unfortunately to my mind] parts company with Traditional Christianity on several points:
The end of the World. No 4th wayers seem willing to take much of the Book of Revelation seriously, all of the 'practicing' Orthodox Christians I have met do. Despite the ever more swiftly-descending octave humanity is in, and despite the many prophecies that have already been fulfilled. Anti-Christ is simply not on the 4th way radar.

G. accepts Islam as being divinely inspired. Orthodox see it as being satanically inspired. It is the only major tradition to come into being AFTER Christianity. G. was a sort of 'proto-ecumenist'.

Christ in the gospels specifically instituted baptism of 'every living creature'. This is understood as a ritual that restores the connection of our fallen spirit with the Holy Spirit.

This is hardly seen as essential in the 4th way.

Their are a few other major points, such as what happens to the soul after death, and some of G's students [Bennett in particualr] have gone some way to reconciling the discrepancies there.

In general though while the goals are similar, many of the techniques are similar, the main difference [as it is w/ all of the major traditions] is what the saints and teachers see in heaven and how they relate these differences to the world. This is where no amount of massaging and esoteric 'explanations' can hide the major differences. Either Islam or Christianity has a record of a bogus Archangel Gabriel fooling someone about Christ's divinity.

No Christian has seen Muhammed in Heaven, No Buddhist has seen Christ. They are it seems going to a different a 'heaven'. They are experiencing a different God, with often contradictory revelations.

Patterson again is focused on the intrigue between Ouspensky, Mouravieff and Amiss. And Amiss poor grasp of both Orthodoxy and the 4th way.

If this review seems excessively long, I can only agree, but hopefully it will be of some real use to someone and dispel a bit of the fog created around the relationship of the Enneagram and G. and far more importantly of Orthodox Christianity and Gurdjieff.

The Arch-Absurd: There is no Fun in Fundamentalism.......2004-06-15

William Patrick Patterson's first book, 'Eating The 'I'', made one heck of an impression on me back in '92. The true account of an ordinary guy grappling tooth-and-bloody-nail to apply the ideas of a powerful esoteric teaching to his life, it was almost painfully candid, invaluably enlightening and beautifully written. I immediately subscribed to his fledgling journal 'Telos' (now 'The Gurdjieff Journal') and eagerly snapped up each new book he wrote. While each successive book has explored a worthy and interesting subject from Patterson's 'Work'-informed perspective, I've detected with some dismay a growing attitude of orthodoxy creeping into his writings. It's as if he's on a personal crusade to take to task those he feels have missed the mark (sinned?) in some way.

'Taking With The Left Hand,' Patterson's third book, provides a good case in point. It's a curiously conservative offering from a man who, in 'Eating The 'I,'' casually referred to himself as a "maverick." The book consists of three essays, each first serialized in Telos.

In the first essay, 'How the Enneagram Came to Market,' the author traces the backgrounds of the various people instrumental in developing and popularizing the "Enneagram of Personality Types:" Oscar Ichazo, Claudio Naranjo, Helen Palmer, et al - none of whom, Patterson wants us to know, has ever had any connection to the authentic lineage of Gurdjieff's oral tradition. And if one hasn't been taught by either Gurdjieff himself, or by anyone Gurdjieff appointed to teach, in Patterson's view they are incapable of advancing in The Work, and still less of contributing anything to it.

'Enneagram' is well written, and the biographical material is well-researched and revealing. The main problem is that the author has failed to actually grapple with the typology which informs his subject. Granted, the essay's title doesn't promise a critical evaluation of the Ennea-types. But consider the implications if Patterson *were* to study the topic and find it valid: He would then have to reconsider his central contention that personality-mapping represents an unauthorized and *therefore* invalid misappropriation of the Enneagram. Instead, he sidesteps the typology itself in favor of an ad hominem campaign of discrediting its proponents.

Consider, however, that long before the "Enneagram craze," a couple of books appeared which attempted to show Enneagrammatic dynamics at work in various processes - cooking a meal, for instance. Not only were these approaches not critically damned, they seemed accepted by the Gurdjieffian mainstream. I've studied both approaches, and found character analysis via the Enneagram to be at least as effective as - and often more practical than - other uses. Could the controversy here really be that Ennea-typing has become too commercial, and its subject is (false-) personality, which typing is believed to reinforce? Or is it merely an example of a growing trend of orthodoxy in the official Gurdjieff Work today, which tends to resist / dismiss any sort of innovation? Need we remind them that Gurdjieff himself was a great innovator, his teachings of unknown provenance?

In the book's second and perhaps strongest essay, 'The People of the Bookmark,' Patterson takes on the 'Fellowship of Friends' (F.O.F.), a Fourth Way school, and its controversial founder and leader, Robert Earl Burton. While I clearly disagree with Patterson's belief that Burton's lack of experience in an "authentic" Fourth Way group *automatically* vitiates any possibility of his having any deeper knowledge, Burton has always seemed as close to the textbook profile of "charismatic cult leader" as it's possible to get, which makes it hard to give him the benefit of the doubt; and then there's F.O.F., with its excruciatingly "refined" sensibilities, studied preciousness and bogus elitism. Critically dismantling such an entity would not be much of a challenge.

However, Patterson goes much deeper in his criticism of Burton than merely objecting to his cultic manifestations: He goes right to the meat of some of 'the teacher's' central tenets and practices, spending some time critiquing his deceptively profound book 'Self Remembering.' For example, he carefully exposes the fallacy of the "divided attention = self-remembering" equation by tracing the phenomenological relationship between "attention" and the "self" in which it moves; and also by pointing out how this practice of "dividing attention" can tend to reify the act of observing, thereby unduly reinforcing the observer. This is a good example of why Patterson is at his best when he drops the dogmatism and speaks simply from his own experience and wisdom.

In 'The Mouravieff Phenomenon,' the book's final essay, the author makes the case that Boris Mouravieff - Russian aristocrat, esotericist, and associate of both Ouspensky and Gurdjieff - was guilty of p lagiarizing Ouspensky's 'In Search of the Miraculous' in his own magnum opus, the three-volume 'Gnosis;' that he fashioned an esoteric hybrid by fusing the ideas of the Fourth Way with those of the Eastern Orthodox Church; and that his understanding of the Fourth Way is derived not from Gurdjieff but from Ouspensky, who was "merely" Gurdjieff's estranged disciple.

Here again we see Patterson not so much as judge and jury, but perhaps as prosecuting attorney: methodically building up his case, making an impassioned - but eminently reasonable - closing statement to the jury, but leaving out the essential fact that he doesn't really know any more about Mouravieff than the jury does. Indeed, this is the least thoroughly researched essay of the bunch, and even after reading it, one has very little sense of who Boris Mouravieff was and on what he might have based his claim to being "authorized" by some esoteric brotherhood to expound what seems like a hybrid of Fourth Way and Eastern Orthodox teachings.

At times Patterson comes on like a politician on a smear campaign, as he impugns the assorted figures in the shadowy hinterland of the Fourth Way fringes. It seems that the erstwhile maverick is a neo-traditionalist who believes the Gurdjieff lineage has become dangerously contaminated by the wiseacrings of psuedo-Gurdjieffian posers and opportunists, while he himself bears the responsibility of crusading to keep the path pure.

Actual rating: 2-1/2 stars.

A Must Read For Any Spiritual Seeker.......2004-05-18

Taking with the Left Hand for any spiritual seeker is a must read. When one is seeking a spiritual path there are many "ways" that one may find and many essence-thieves are waiting for their opportunity to take their advantage. There are people who have invested many years into false teachings, one that has been made up of parts of one teaching and a dash of other teachings then mixing in their own projections and misunderstandings to complete their "way." Mr. Patterson has created a book that can be used as a lifeboat when one is drowning in the pool of false teachers.

At the sign of the hand-in-hand where is set forth an Account of Divers things chiefly concerning Insurance before and after the War for american Indpendence

Average customer rating:

At the sign of the hand-in-hand where is set forth an Account of Divers things chiefly concerning Insurance before and after the War for american Indpendence
Number 212 South Fourth Street in the City of Philadelphia The Office of the Philadelphia Contributionship for the Insurance of Houses loss by fire
Manufacturer: Lippincott
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
ASIN: B000NOYSBK

Bridge hands for the connoisseur;: The fourth collection of interesting bridge problems

Average customer rating:

Bridge hands for the connoisseur;: The fourth collection of interesting bridge problems
Eric Charles Milnes
Manufacturer: Kaye & Ward
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Unknown Binding

General | Sports | Subjects | Books
ASIN: 0718209605

Constructor: A Hand-Book of Machine Design, with Portrait and over 1,200 Illustrations. Authorized Translation, Complete and Unabridged, from the Fourth Enl German Edition by Henry Harrison Suplee

Average customer rating:

Constructor: A Hand-Book of Machine Design, with Portrait and over 1,200 Illustrations. Authorized Translation, Complete and Unabridged, from the Fourth Enl German Edition by Henry Harrison Suplee
Franz Reuleaux
Manufacturer: H. H. SUPLEE
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
ASIN: B000UG2Z84

Average customer rating:

Den fjerde hand (The Fourth Hand)
John Irving
Manufacturer: Lindhardt og Righof
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
ASIN: 8759519584

Fourth Concerto in c Minor for the Piano Opus 44. 2 Pianos, 4 Hands (Schirmer's Library of Musical Classis, Vol. 1486)

Average customer rating:

Fourth Concerto in c Minor for the Piano Opus 44. 2 Pianos, 4 Hands (Schirmer's Library of Musical Classis, Vol. 1486)
Camille; Philipp, Isidor (editor) Saint-Saens
Manufacturer: G. Schirmer
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
ASIN: B000KPXXMW

Fourth Concerto Op.40. Two Pianos - Four Hands

Average customer rating:

Fourth Concerto Op.40. Two Pianos - Four Hands
S. Rachmaninoff
Manufacturer: Charles Foley Music
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Unknown Binding
ASIN: B0000D1YMP

Average customer rating:

The Fourth Hand

Manufacturer: Random House
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
ASIN: 0965197662

Product Description

A paperback novel, identical in content to the hardcover version.

Books:

Books Index

Books Home

Recommended Books